Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
Partner Vogel Says That Went Down as "Personal Loans" to the Business. THE PARTNER IS BROKE. "Haven't a Cent," He Cries, After Tolling Off Millions He's Down for Jointly. The thousands of depositors in the defunct banking firm of Henry Siegel & Co. learned to-day that their money, loaned to the various stores in which Henry Siegel and Frank E. Vogel were co-partners, appeared on the books of the stores as "personal loans" from Siegel and Vogel. Further, they were coolly informed that the bankers had agreed among themselves that all debts of the stores were to be paid off before the depositors' money, borrowed by Siegel and Vogel, was to be returned to the private bank. Frank E. Vogel, Siegel's co-partner, was examined at length to-day before George C. Holt, special master appointed for the examination by Judge Hough, of the United States I District Court. The examination took o place in the offices of Douglass, Armitage & McCann, in the Woolworth Building. $ Vogel, under examination by Joseph N. Rosenburg, was asked: "When Henry Siegel & Co., Bank. ers, loaned money to one of the Siegel stores-Simpson, Crawford & Co., for instance-how did it appear on the books of the store? NOT SHOWN TO BE MONEY OF DEPOSITORS. I "The book-keepers were instructed to post on the books of the store the sum loaned under the caption 8 that it was a 'personal loan' from Henry Siegel and myself to the store," : was the reply. f "And the books of the store do not show that the money was, in reality, 3 the money of the bank's depositor's." "The books show that Henry Siegel I and myself made 'personal loans' to the stores." I Vogel added that he and Siegel had an unwritten agreement among themo selves that all the debts owed to wholesalers for merchandise, to newspapers for advertising and to banks t and brokers for money borrowed was a to be paid in full by the stores beI fore they repaid to the banking firm of Henry Siegel & Co., bankers, the sums they had loaned as "personal a loans" to the various Siegel stores. Much about the money borrowed on notes by Henry Siegel or his partner, Frank E. Vogel, was told in the tesI timony of Mr. Vogel. A committee of depositors was rep= resented by John P. Murray of : Coudert Brothers. John B. Stanchfield represented Henry Siegel and a Mr. Vogel, while Arthur C. Train of 1 the District-Attorney's staff was an a interested spectator. Mr. Vogel was t examined by Joseph N. Rosenburg, attorney for the receivers for the shares. THE CREDIT OF A BIG BUSINESS MAN. Something of a Big Business man's credit was shown by Mr. Vogel when he submitted his schedule of liabilities. He owed the National Bank of the Republic a personal debt of $135,t 835, secured by collateral. He further is indorser for a note for $100,000 to the same bank, the note being made by Siegel, but the collateral being put up Vogel as "an accommodation" to his partner. The same condition exists in a $50,000 loan made by the Central Trust Company of Chicago. Mr. Vogel said he also indorsed a $75,000 note of Siegel, Cooper & Co. of Chicago in the Central Trust Company, but no collateral was put up. His name, with Siegel's, appears as indorser of $715,000 worth of notes of ( the Simpson, Crawford Company, these notes being held by Goldman, Sachs & So., the National Park Bank, the Bank of the Metropolis and the Garfield National Bank. With Siegel, too, he indorsed $1,360,000 worth of notes for Siegel. Cooper & Cc. of Chicago, thees notes being held by A. G. Becker, Goldman, Sachs & Co. and Chicago banks $ Mr. Vogel explained that he and Mr. Siegel are joint indorsers of notes of $250,000 of the Fourteenth Street Store and $287,500 of notes of the