15988. Henry Bischoff & Co. (New York, NY)

Bank Information

Episode Type
Run → Suspension → Closure
Bank Type
private
Start Date
January 10, 1914
Location
New York, New York (40.714, -74.006)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini
Short Digest
0270b1c8

Response Measures

Full suspension, Books examined

Other: Receivership/bankruptcy proceedings and riots by depositors; receiver initially appointed to associated copartnership business (steamship ticket/brokerage) and later receivership/ bankruptcy extended to banking house; criminal investigation of bank books initiated.

Description

A receiver was appointed for the copartnership on 1914-01-10; the appointment precipitated a quiet run and the banking house soon stopped accepting deposits and was announced to be dissolved/closing. The articles distinguish the partnership (which went into receivership) from the incorporated Bischoff's Banking House, but later coverage shows the bank quit taking deposits and will close — effectively a run followed by suspension/closure. No reopening is reported.

Events (4)

1. January 10, 1914 Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
To preserve the assets of Henry Bischoff & Co., ... that firm today was placed in the hands of a receiver. Maurice Deiches was appointed receiver under $100,000 bonds.
Source
newspapers
2. January 11, 1914 Run
Cause
Bank Specific Adverse Info
Cause Details
Run triggered by publicity and alarm following the appointment of a receiver for the related copartnership and revelations of creditor claims/possible insolvency.
Measures
Bank quit taking deposits and notified depositors to call for their money; receivers and trustees appointed to handle claims.
Newspaper Excerpt
The bank was subjected to . quiet run after a receiver was appointed on January 10 for the copartnership ...
Source
newspapers
3. January 29, 1914 Suspension
Cause
Bank Specific Adverse Info
Cause Details
Bank ceased accepting deposits and was ordered/will be wound up after receivership and creditor actions; assets/claims prompted closure.
Newspaper Excerpt
BISCHOFF'S BANK WILL CLOSE. Refuses to Accept Deposits Wants Depositors to Take Out Cash.
Source
newspapers
4. March 12, 1914 Other
Newspaper Excerpt
BISCHOFF DEPOSITORS RIOT WHEN MONEY IS NOT FORTHCOMING. ... 500 depositors ... clamoring for money ... no money in sight.
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (10)

Article from Evening Star, January 11, 1914

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

IN HANDS OF RECEIVER. Step Taken to Preserve Assets of Henry Bischoff & Co. NEW YORK, January 10.-To preserve the assets of Henry Bischoff & Co., one of the oldest banking houses in the city, that firm today was placed in the hands of a receiver. The application in bankruptcy was filed by an employe who has a small claim for services. Maurice Deiches was appointed receiver under $100,000 bonds. Papers in the suit stated that other claims were pending which could not be met. No statement was made regarding assets and liabilities, but it was said the receivership was not due to insolvency. The partners of Henry Bischoff & Co. are James S. Meng and William J. Becker. Bischoff's banking house issued a. statement to the effect that it was a separate institution which had nothing whatever to do with the firm for which a receiver was appoined.


Article from The Sun, January 11, 1914

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

DEICHES NAMED AS BISCHOFF RECEIVER Takes Charge of Brokers' Office Court Order Doesn't Affect Bank. NO CLAIM OF INSOLVENCY Creditor's Action Explained as Effort to Protect $500,000 Assets. Supreme Court Justice Guy appointed Maurice Delches receiver yesterday of the coparthership of James S. Meng and Willlam J. Becker, doing business under the name of Henry Bischoff & Co. on the fourth floor of the building occupied by Bischoff's Banking House, at Duane street and Broadway. The receivership applies only to the steamship ticket, brokerage and forwarding business done by the firm and does not affect the bank, although Mr. Meng is president and a director of the bank and Becker is a director. The receiver was appointed in a suit brought by Carl Wittman, acting for himself and other creditors. The assets of the copartnership are said to amount to about $500,000. The papers state nothing is to the liabilities of the partners except that they "are now and will be unable to pay large outstanding debts, including a judgment for $10.000 obtained by the Montreal Engineering Company." Receiver Gives $100,000 Bond. The plaintiff said that the suit was not brought on the ground of the insolvency of the firm but for the purpose of preserving the assets. Receiver Deiches took charge of the business of the copartnership yesterday afternoon after giving a bond for $100.000. Albert P. Massey. a son-in-law of the late Justice Henry Bischoff and a director of the bank. made this statement: "The receivership has nothing whatever to do with Bischoff's Banking House. Henry Bischoff & Co. is an independent concern. operating separate from the bank. The bank is a duly incorporated institution under the banking laws of the State of New York and was recently examined by State officials and found to be in good condition." Bischoff's Banking House has a capital of $250,000. James S. Meng. who is executor under Justice Bischoff's will. is president. August Winkoop is cashier. The directors are Mr. Meng. George Batten, William J. Becker. Frank J. Liesecki, Adolf Vogel, Herman Winter and Albert P. Massey.


Article from The Salt Lake Tribune, January 11, 1914

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

RECEIVER APPOINTED TO PRESERVE ASSETS NEW YORK. Jan. 10.-To preserve the assets of Henry Bischoff & Co., one of the oldest banking houses in the city, that firm today was placed in the hands of a receiver. The application in bankruptcy was filed by an employee who has a small claim for services. Maurice Deiches was appointed receiver under $100,000 bonds. Papers in the suit stated that other claims were pending which could not be met. No statement was made regarding assets and liabilities, but it was said that the receivership was not due to insolvency. The partners of Henry Bischoff & Co. are James 8. Meng and William J. Becker. Bischoff's banking house issued a statement that it was a separate institution which had nothing whatever to do with the firm for which a receiver was appointed.


Article from The Birmingham Age-Herald, January 11, 1914

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

BISCHOFF & CO. IN RECEIVER'S HANDS New York, January 10.-To preserve assets of Henry Bischoff & Co., one of the oldest banking houses in the city, that firm today was placed in the hands of a receiver. Maurice Deiches was appointed receiver under $100,000 bond. Papers in the suit stated that claims were pending which could not be met. No statement was made regarding assets"and liabilities. but it was said the receivership was not due to insolvency, Bischoff's banking house issued a statement that it was a separate institution which had nothing whatever to do with the firm for which 1 receiver was appointed.


Article from The Sun, January 29, 1914

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

HOW TO SUCCEED WITH FLOWERS Read the Gardening Notes IN THE SUNDAY SUN BISCHOFF'S BANK WILL CLOSE. Refuses to Accept Deposits Wants Depositors to Take Out Cash. Bischoff's Banking House at 287 Broad. way, founded in 1848 by Henry Bischoff. father of the late Supreme Court Justice Henry Bischoff, is to be dissolved. The bank was subjected to . quiet run after a receiver was appointed on January 10 for the copartnership of Henry Bischoff & Co., doing a steamship ticket. forwarding and general brokerage business in the same building. The fact became known yesterday that Carl Wittman. a stockholder of the bank. who instituted the receivership proceed. ings against Henry Bischoff & Co., got an order from Justice Seabury directing all persons interested to show cause on March 15 why the business should not be wound up. The petition stated that the bank had quit taking deposits and that $24,471 was held for depositors, who have been not: fied to call for the money. The capital stock of the bank Is $250,000. and the last balance sheet showed assets of $283,* 799 and liabilities of the same amount


Article from The Sun, February 17, 1914

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

TRICKERY CHARGED IN BISCHOFF FAILURE Creditors' Lawyer Alleges Fraud in Receivership Proceedings. CALLS JUDGE PARTNER Claims. He Says. Will Be Made Against Estate of Dead Jurist. Irving L. Ernst. one of the attorneys for the creditors of Henry Bischoff & Co. and the Bischoff Banking House, Inc., told Judge Hand in the United States District Court yesterday that he was convinced his clients had a substantial claim against the estate of the late Supreme Court Justice Henry Bischoff and that they would attempt to levy the estate in order to satisfy their claims. Justice Bischoff fell down an elevator shaft last March and was killed instantly. It was supposed at the time that he had disposed of his interest in the Bischoff banking enterprise. AccordIng to Mr. Ernst the depositors had every reason to believe that the Justice was a member of the partnership up to the time of his death. Mr. Ernst told the court that the Bischoff bank never invested a. dollar of the money deposited with it in any good securities. All the money, he said, went Into the "pockets" of the importing and exporting business of Henry Bischoff & Co. Lawyer Accuses Becker. After Maurice Deiches was appointed geceiver in the State Supreme Court, WillSam J. Becker, one of the Bischoff partnera, drew his entire account of $400 from the National Park Bank, according to Mr. Ernst. Becker, he said, also oolSected rents from his property on Ninetysixth street, which he failed to turn over to the "receiver, although he afterwards turned over the property itself. Mr. Ernst accused Albert P. Massey, attorney for the Bischoff bank and also for Deiches. of arranging the suit brought by Carl Wittman, which resulted in the appointment of Deiches as receiver. Wittman was an employee of Henry Bischoff & Co. He sued for $500. According to Mr. Ernst, Wittman had no treat claim against the concern. Massey, Mr. Ernst said, told him that the suit was brought after a conference between the partners of the banking house and Wittman. Mr. Ernst asked that Deiches be made receiver in the bankruptcy proceedings. no that he would be liable to the Federal courts as well as to the State courts. Judge Hand denied this request. but orHered that all the books of the Bischoft enterprises be opened for inspection. He added that he didn't think that a receiver could, with propriety, issue powers of attorney calling for his appointment as trustee in bankruptcy. Able to Pay All, Says Massey, Albert P. Massey told Judge Hand that Henry Bischoff & Co. had cash assets amounting to $100,000 in excess of their debts. Becker, he said, had turned over $158,000 of his stock in the Bischoff Banking House. Inc. Deiches, he said, had asked Becker for his other assets. including the rents on the Ninety-sixth street property. "But," concluded Massey, "Becker is a hardheaded Dutchman." Attorney James Wheatland Smith, also representing the creditors, said that he had been quoted to the effect that the whole affair was a. rotten inside job. He said that he had looked the word "job" up in the dictionary and found that it meant an undertaking ostensibly for the public good. but in reality for one's own good. That characterized the proceedings against the Bischoff enterprises in the State courts, he said. Neither the public nor the depositors knew the truth about the business of Henry Bischoff & Co., he said.


Article from New-York Tribune, February 17, 1914

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

MANY DUPED IN BANK SETTLEMENT, IS CHARGE Depositors Would Have "Used Gun for Pen," Says Aid for Bischoff Creditors. A motion was entered before Judge Hand in the United States District Court yesterday to have Herman Dieches, receiver in the equity proceedings against Henry Bischoff & Co., insolvent bankers, named as receiver by the Federal Court, SO that he will be under that court's direction. This step was taken by Irving L. Ernst and James Wheatland Smith, attorney for the creditors. It was stated by the attorneys that they believe the estate of Justice Bischoff is a member of the banking firm and that the creditors have a substantial claim on the estate. Mr. Ernst asserted that Justice Bischoff, at the time of his death, was a member of the banking firm; "that James S. Meng and William J. Becker, copartners in the firm, had agreed to pay $60,000 for Justice Bischoff's interest; that $30,000 of this had been borrowed by them without security, and that the other $20,000 was taken from the deposits in the bank. "In the examination in bankruptcy we have only scratched the surface of conditions obtaining at both the banking house of Henry Bischoff & Co. and the Bischoft Banking House, Inc., but we learned enough to know that money deposited by the ignorant foreigners, for which 3 per cent per annum was paid, either went into the pockets of the copartnership, formed of William J. Becker and James S. Meng, or it went into the importing and exporting business of Henry Bischoff & Co." Mr. Ernst said that when the "ignorant depositors" made inquiries about their money they were handed powers of attorney to sign, which assigned to a lawyer named Schenck, employed in the office of Albert P. Massey, an attorney, the right to vote for Dieches as trustee. "Had these ignorant Russians known the situation," remarked Mr. Smith, "they probably would have used a gun instead of a pen when presented with these papers." Massey said that the Bischoff Banking House, Inc., was absolutely solvent.


Article from The Evening World, March 12, 1914

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

BISCHOFF DEPOSITORS RIOT WHEN MONEY IS NOT FORTHCOMING. Laboring under the mistaken impression that they were about to get some money, 500 depositors in the bankrupt banking house of Henry Bischoff & Co., No. 287 Broadway, gathered in a suite of rooms on the fifth floor of the Woolworth Building to-day, and when the money was not forthcoming precipitated a disturbance that required the services of the Greenwich street precinct police reserves. It took twenty husky cops an hour to get the hysterical and disappointed gathering out of the building by way of the freight elevator. It was a polyglot gathering of poor people who had intrusted their small savings to the Bischoff concern. Few of them could speak English and those who could were not able to give intelligent attention to the proceedings. They assembled in response to notices sent out by Referee in Bankruptcy Magrane Coxe asking them to meet and vote for the appointment of trustees to act for their interests in the negotiations with the receivers of the Bischoff business. Inasmuch as not more than a score of the 500 knew what the meeting was about, the selection of trustees proved to be an easy matter. Irving L. Ernest, counsel for the receivers, nominated Maurice Deiches, Louis Hoffman and Edward C. Dusenberry to look after the interests of the positors. Referee Coxe put on his hat and overcoat and left the room and the lawyers started for the door. This was the cue for trouble. A Pole climbed up on a desk and started to harangue. German. Yiddish, Lithuanian, Croatian and other dia. lects began to pop like firecrackers. In the tumult It was gathered that the crowd was clamoring for money. Mr. Deiches, who is massively constructed, almost had his clothes torn off, he furnishing a conspleuous object of attack. Mr. Ernest, Mr. Hoffman and Mr. Dusenberry tried in vain to explain that there was no money in sight. The uproar increased in volume. Some of the poor depositors, thinking that the fact that money was not forthcoming meant the loss of their hoards, started for the windows with the intention of jumping out. The building employees finally telephoned for the police. The appear ance of th bluecoats only added to the disturbance. It was necessary to carry some of the women to the olo vators,


Article from The Sun, March 13, 1914

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

WHITMAN TO TAKE UP BISCHOFF FAILURE Depositors Say Bank Took Money Almost to Hour of Closing. Statements made yesterday to Assistant District Attorney Colnon may result in an investigation by the District Attorney's office of the affairs of the banking house of Henry Bischoff & Co., which is now in the hands of a receiver. While depositors in the bank were alleging to Mr. Colnon that deposits were received almost up to the hour of failure the creditors of the company were holding a stormy meeting in the office of Referee Macgrane Coxe in the Woolworth Building. Mr. Coxe's office could not hold a third of the 500 persons, mostly of foreign birth, who tried to attend the meeting, and all the porters and available employees in the building had a hard time handling the crowd. Men and women fought to get to the narrow door of the office. At one time it looked as If police help would have to be called, but finally volunteer interpreters explained to all within hearing that their rights would not suffer and they quieted down, although none left until the meeting was over. Those who got inside the room where the meeting was held were the early arrivals. The late comers soon filled the halls and scrambled to get closer, crying out that they were being cheated and demanding a hearing. The creditors elected as trustees Maurice Deíches, who was named receiver in the State courts, where the Bischoff firm made an assignment before it was put into bankruptcy : Lewis Hoffman, an attorney, and Edwin C. Dusenbury, under a joint bond of $100,000. Mr. Colnon will confer to-day with District Attorney Whitman and will then decide whether to have experts go over the Bischoff company's books, which are now in possession of the receivers.


Article from The Sun, March 17, 1914

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

# CALLS FOR BISCHOFF BOOKS. Whitman Directs Full Investigation of Depositors' Complaints, More depositors of Henry Bischoff & Co., bankers, no win the hands of a receiver, called at the District Attorney's office yesterday to make criminal charges that their deposits were accepted when it was known that the bank was insolvent. More than a dozen complaints have been filed and District Attorney Whitman directed his assistant, Aaron J. Colnon, to start an investigation to see if any crime had been committed. Mr. Colnon directed the production of books of the bank and expert accountants will begin work as soon as they are received. In all probability Daniel W. Quinn, Jr., a State bank examiner, will be called in to assist Mr. Colnon. Mr. Quinn is at present working on the Siegel-Vogel failure.