Germania Bank - New York, NY

Bank Information

Episode Type: Suspension → Closure
Bank Type: state
Start Date: May 26, 1876
Location: New York, New York (40.714, -74.006)

Metadata

Model: gpt-5-mini
Short Digest: 263faa87

Response Measures

None

Description

Newspaper item (The New York Herald, 1876-05-26) reports that George S. Schuitz was appointed receiver for the Germania Bank. The article does not describe a prior run or an explicit suspension notice — only that a receiver was appointed. I classify this as suspension_closure because the bank is being placed in receivership (closure) with no run reported. Bank type not stated in the text, so set to unknown.

Events (1)

1. May 26, 1876 Receivership

Newspaper Excerpt: The Germania Bank VS. der.-George S. Schuitz appointed receiver.
Source: newspapers

Newspaper Articles (1)

1. May 26, 1876 The New York Herald New York, NY

Article from The New York Herald, May 26, 1876

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

DECISIONS. SUPREME COURT-CHAMBERS. By Judge Donohuc. Basso vs. Levy.-Order granted. Rhodes vs. Farley.-Report of referee confirmed. Burchell, &c., vs. Forrest-There should be a reference to ascertain facts. Graut vs. Jonas, &c.-Tno order to be entered as heretofore ordered. By Judge Larremore. McKeon vs. Donnell.-In the absence of a bi!l of particulars, and on the authority of decisions ID Martin vs. Gould and McCahill vs. Donnell, this motion must be denied, without prejudice and without costs. Oliver vs. Morrison.-Injunction continued pendente lite upon plaintiff filing security for amount of alleged claim and interest. Brown vs. Kipp.-Default opened on payment of the costs and disbursements of triul and costs of motion. Blessing VS. Reilly.-Application should be made to the Judge who tried the cause. Heilbrun vs. Racey et al. -Motion to strike out proposed case granted, with costs. Josephthal vs. Steffen.-Application granted on payment of costs. Sturtevant vs. Sherassen.-Motion granted on payment of costs. Fitzgerald vs. Ellen, &c.-Application denied, without costs. Prouty vs. Swin.-Motion donied without costs and without prejudice to a renewal thereof before Judge Barrett. In the matter of Schwartzler.-No proceedings have been taken 10 set aside the awards the stay is vacated. Listman vs. Blant-Stay granted upon defendant filing security for $1,000 with sureties, &c. Marquand vs. Denckler.-Motion for reference denied, with costs to abide event, Josephthal vs. Steffen.-Motion granted. Sutphen vs. Lash.-Motion denied without costs. Eybel vs. Phluger.-Motiongranted. Lillienthal vs. Branch-Injunction dissolved. Kelly vs. Scripture.-Motion granted. Dauchy vs. French.-Preliminary objections overruled. McKenna vs. Scriptura-Motion granted. Covert Cockroff.-Injunction continued. Lewisohm vs. Drew.-Application granted. SUPREME COURT-SPECIAL TERM. By Judge Van Vorst. Ham vs. Vilmar.-Findings of fact and conclusions of law settled and an engrossed copy should be presented for signature. SUPERIOR COURT-SPECIAL TERM. By Judge Spetr. Schryer vs. Minger.-0 to amend summons, &c. granted. Wystall vs. Smyth et al.-Order for judgment. The East River National Bank vs. Murphy.-Frederick S. Wait appointed receiver, &c. Lee vs. Lee.-Reference ordered. Shaw vs. Slater.-Undertaking approved. Tyng vs. Marsh et 1.-Motion granted ordering printed case and exceptions on the files of this court, and that the case and exceptions on the part of the plaintiff be deemed abandoned. Aberle vs. Fagan.-Motion for a new trial denied Wheeler, &c., V& Small, &c.-Motion denied, with $10 costs to plaintiff. Hesse vs Bruckell et -Reference ordered. Farley vs. Benedich-Proceedings dismissed, with $10 costs to defendant. Bradford vs. Prentice et al. Testimony filed. Martin vs. Gould et al.-Default opened and leave given to plaintiffs to serve complaint, &c. Martin vs. Gould.-Motion denied, without costs. Jones vs. Rowe et al.-Referee's report of sale confirmed. Karscher vs. Buliner.-Reference ordered to Hon. J. 8. Bosworth. Glaser vs. The Amity Fire Insurance Company.Upon the defendant's delivering the accounts of the plaintiff's loss in his possession, or in possession of his special agent, Winterton, the plaintiff must serve upon detendant's attorney the bill of particulars asked for. Memorandum. In the matter of the application of Henry Metzger et al.-Referee's report confirmed. Poillon vs. Lawrence etal., Rehm vs. The Western Union Telegraph Company, Graham vs. Livermore, Finke VS. The Orient Mutual Insurance Company, Schryer vs. Dettinger et al., Dwyer vs. The Weed Sewing Machine Company, Wheeler vs. Small, &c: Newfield vs. Copperman. Grittin vs. The Broadway and Seventh Avenue Railroad Company, Whelin vs. ihe Third Avenue Railroad Company, Chatierton vs. Mul. ford et al., Weble vs. Conner.-Unders granted. By Judge Curtis The Ball's Head Bank ol New York vs. McFeters ct al.-Findings settled. By Judge Sanford. Daly vs. Wailach.-Judgmentsigned. MARINE COURT--CHAMBERS By Judge McAdam. White vs. Campbell; Cookling vs. Rogers ; Bornard VS. Cleveland.-Opinions filed. The Germania Bank VS. der.-George S. Schuitz appointed receiver. Van Name vs. Van Name-Motion to dismiss pro. coodings, &c. granted. Do Forest vs. Wood. -Motion denied, appearance set aside and admission el service vaested: DO costs. Herrmana V8. Moore.-T issues on this motion will