East River National Bank

Bank Information

Episode Type: Suspension → Closure
Bank Type: national
Bank ID: 1105
Charter Number: 1105
Start Date: May 26, 1876
Location: New York, New York (40.714, -74.006)

Metadata

Model: gpt-5-mini
Short Digest: c5e895dd

Response Measures

None

Description

Two court notices in May and June 1876 show receivers were appointed for the East River National Bank (Frederick S. Wait on 1876-05-26; John Henry McCarthy on 1876-06-17). The articles do not describe any depositor run or an explicit temporary suspension/reopening — they report receivership appointments, implying closure. Selected episode_type assumes the bank closed and entered receivership without reported run.

Events (3)

1. May 1, 1865 Chartered

Source: historical_nic

2. May 26, 1876 Receivership

Newspaper Excerpt: The East River National Bank vs. Murphy.-Frederick S. Wait appointed receiver, &c.
Source: newspapers

3. June 17, 1876 Receivership

Newspaper Excerpt: The East River National Bank vs. Glover.-Mr. John Henry McCarthy appointed receiver.
Source: newspapers

Newspaper Articles (2)

1. May 26, 1876 The New York Herald New York, NY

Article from The New York Herald, May 26, 1876

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

DECISIONS. SUPREME COURT-CHAMBERS. By Judge Donohuc. Basso vs. Levy.-Order granted. Rhodes vs. Farley.-Report of referee confirmed. Burchell, &c., vs. Forrest-There should be a reference to ascertain facts. Graut vs. Jonas, &c.-Tno order to be entered as heretofore ordered. By Judge Larremore. McKeon vs. Donnell.-In the absence of a bi!l of particulars, and on the authority of decisions ID Martin vs. Gould and McCahill vs. Donnell, this motion must be denied, without prejudice and without costs. Oliver vs. Morrison.-Injunction continued pendente lite upon plaintiff filing security for amount of alleged claim and interest. Brown vs. Kipp.-Default opened on payment of the costs and disbursements of triul and costs of motion. Blessing VS. Reilly.-Application should be made to the Judge who tried the cause. Heilbrun vs. Racey et al. -Motion to strike out proposed case granted, with costs. Josephthal vs. Steffen.-Application granted on payment of costs. Sturtevant vs. Sherassen.-Motion granted on payment of costs. Fitzgerald vs. Ellen, &c.-Application denied, without costs. Prouty vs. Swin.-Motion donied without costs and without prejudice to a renewal thereof before Judge Barrett. In the matter of Schwartzler.-No proceedings have been taken 10 set aside the awards the stay is vacated. Listman vs. Blant-Stay granted upon defendant filing security for $1,000 with sureties, &c. Marquand vs. Denckler.-Motion for reference denied, with costs to abide event, Josephthal vs. Steffen.-Motion granted. Sutphen vs. Lash.-Motion denied without costs. Eybel vs. Phluger.-Motiongranted. Lillienthal vs. Branch-Injunction dissolved. Kelly vs. Scripture.-Motion granted. Dauchy vs. French.-Preliminary objections overruled. McKenna vs. Scriptura-Motion granted. Covert Cockroff.-Injunction continued. Lewisohm vs. Drew.-Application granted. SUPREME COURT-SPECIAL TERM. By Judge Van Vorst. Ham vs. Vilmar.-Findings of fact and conclusions of law settled and an engrossed copy should be presented for signature. SUPERIOR COURT-SPECIAL TERM. By Judge Spetr. Schryer vs. Minger.-0 to amend summons, &c. granted. Wystall vs. Smyth et al.-Order for judgment. The East River National Bank vs. Murphy.-Frederick S. Wait appointed receiver, &c. Lee vs. Lee.-Reference ordered. Shaw vs. Slater.-Undertaking approved. Tyng vs. Marsh et 1.-Motion granted ordering printed case and exceptions on the files of this court, and that the case and exceptions on the part of the plaintiff be deemed abandoned. Aberle vs. Fagan.-Motion for a new trial denied Wheeler, &c., V& Small, &c.-Motion denied, with $10 costs to plaintiff. Hesse vs Bruckell et -Reference ordered. Farley vs. Benedich-Proceedings dismissed, with $10 costs to defendant. Bradford vs. Prentice et al. Testimony filed. Martin vs. Gould et al.-Default opened and leave given to plaintiffs to serve complaint, &c. Martin vs. Gould.-Motion denied, without costs. Jones vs. Rowe et al.-Referee's report of sale confirmed. Karscher vs. Buliner.-Reference ordered to Hon. J. 8. Bosworth. Glaser vs. The Amity Fire Insurance Company.Upon the defendant's delivering the accounts of the plaintiff's loss in his possession, or in possession of his special agent, Winterton, the plaintiff must serve upon detendant's attorney the bill of particulars asked for. Memorandum. In the matter of the application of Henry Metzger et al.-Referee's report confirmed. Poillon vs. Lawrence etal., Rehm vs. The Western Union Telegraph Company, Graham vs. Livermore, Finke VS. The Orient Mutual Insurance Company, Schryer vs. Dettinger et al., Dwyer vs. The Weed Sewing Machine Company, Wheeler vs. Small, &c: Newfield vs. Copperman. Grittin vs. The Broadway and Seventh Avenue Railroad Company, Whelin vs. ihe Third Avenue Railroad Company, Chatierton vs. Mul. ford et al., Weble vs. Conner.-Unders granted. By Judge Curtis The Ball's Head Bank ol New York vs. McFeters ct al.-Findings settled. By Judge Sanford. Daly vs. Wailach.-Judgmentsigned. MARINE COURT--CHAMBERS By Judge McAdam. White vs. Campbell; Cookling vs. Rogers ; Bornard VS. Cleveland.-Opinions filed. The Germania Bank VS. der.-George S. Schuitz appointed receiver. Van Name vs. Van Name-Motion to dismiss pro. coodings, &c. granted. Do Forest vs. Wood. -Motion denied, appearance set aside and admission el service vaested: DO costs. Herrmana V8. Moore.-T issues on this motion will

2. June 17, 1876 The New York Herald New York, NY

Article from The New York Herald, June 17, 1876

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

DECISIONS. SUPREME COURT--CHAMBERE. By Judge Lawrence. Allison vs. The Oliver & Harris Company.-I do not see why an order should be made requiring the witness proposed to be examined to produce the books and papers mentioned in the order. The affidavit seems to state facts sufficient to authorize the granting of an order for the examination of the witness under the provisions of part 3, chapter 7, title 3, article 5, of the Revised Statutes. By Judge Donohue. Dewhurst vs. Bacharach-Granted two and a half per cent allowance. Ryan vs. Ryan.- Reference ordered. In the matter of Dickie.-Report confirmed. Barnett vs. Meyer.-Granted on payment of $10 costs. The German-American Bank vs. The Williams Mower and Reaper Company et al.-Costs as adjusted. Middleton VS. Bowne.-Motion denied. Memorandum. Berger VS. Raymond.--Motion granted on payment of costs of action. The German-American Bank vs. The Pittston and Elmira Coal Company.-Costs ns adjusted. In the matter of Rives, &c.-When the accounting is had think the Surrogate has power to diapose of all asked for. Morgan vs. The Continental Life Insurance Company.-Motion grantad. 1 think the proper place to try the question of right is with the federal court. Brewster vs. Oatley.-No papers submitted on which any question can be passe on. Tracy vs. Arms.-Receiverappointed. Hinadale vs. Heidenheim.-Motion denied, without costs. Bryan VR. The Proli Belt Company.--Motion depied. Walsh VR. Walsh.-Memorandum. In the matter opening 110th street-Ordergranted Maskell vs. Krausse.-Denied. In the matter of Beruheimer.-Motiou denied. Marshall vs. Marshall; Murtha et al. vs. Murtha: Howe vs. Little: Sloane vs. Miller (Nos. 1 and 2).Granted. SUPREME COURT-SPECIAL, TERM. By Judge Lawrence. Gano vs. McCunn et al. -As it appears that certain of the defendants have been served by publication and their time to answer has not expired this case is improperly upon the calendar, and the motion to strike it therefrom must be granted. By Judge Van Vorst. Morris et al. vs. Porter.-Findings of fact and judgment for plaintiff settled and signed. Taliman vs. Taliman et aL-Findings settled and signed. SUPERIOR COURT-SPECIAL TERM. By Judge Sodgwick. The People. &c., vs. Bull--Motion denied, with $10 costs. Crowell vs. Crowell.-Order settled. Wilson vs. Knapp.-$150 allowance. Schertnerhoru vs. Wheeler.-Motion denied, with $5 costs. Lambricht VE. Meagher; Herman VR. Meagher, and Zulick vs. Cook.-Ordered on short calendar. Bartholomew vs. Engler et al.-Judgment vacated. Hess vs. Burckel-Leave to serve supplemental complaint granted. The American Medicine Company vs. Kossler.-Remittitur filed. Anderson vs. Priest.-Orders or the 8th and 12th of June vacated, with $10 costs to abide event. Smith vs. Short.-Complaint to be filed within five days. The Dry Dock Savings Institution VR. Cobb.-Reference ordered. Rogers vs. Rowe et al-Referee's report confirmed, &c. The National Park Bank vs. Bucking.-Decree signed. Struppman vs. Muller.-Order settled. Neher vs. Donough et. al.; Wood et al. vs. Davis; The Webster Loom Company vs. Whittaker; Uhlman vs. Kohner; Holman vs. The Central National Bank: Oberle vs. Fagan; Struppman vs. Miller; Washburn vs. The Dry Dock Savings Institution, and Donohue vs. Johnson.-Orders$ granted. COMMON PLEAS-SPECIAL TERM. By Judge Van Hoesen. Murray vs. Cassen.-Motion for new trial denied. Shaw vs. baw.-Order of reference to Bettle issues Santord vs. Hurd.-Motion donied. MARINE COURT-CHAMBERS. By Judge McAdam. Fluschauer vs. Wortge.-Motion to exonerate sureties deuied. Lanaux vs. Meyer; Raynolds vs. Bramlacht-See indorsement on papers. Bloomingdale vs. Oatman.-Proceedings stayed until costs of former action are paid. Carlislo vs. Davis.-Discontinuance allowed on payment of $50 costs. Simonson vs. Meyering.-Arrest vacated on stipulating not to sue. Black vs. Frey.-Judgment for plaintiff. Thompson vs. Dupont.-Motion denied. Ott vs. McArthur.- -Order settled. Black vs. Freedlander; Harvey vs. Miniszek; Nicholson vs. Conner; The East River National Bank vs. Glover.-Mr. John Henry McCarthy appointed receiver.