15060. Bank of Dansville (Dansville, NY)

Bank Information

Episode Type
Suspension → Closure
Bank Type
state
Start Date
May 1, 1884*
Location
Dansville, New York (42.561, -77.696)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini
Short Digest
615ca975

Response Measures

None

Description

The Bank of Dansville suspended in May 1884 and a receiver (Reuben Whiteman) was appointed (May 19, 1884). Coverage describes diversion/mingling of trust funds, missing notes and insolvency — bank-specific malfeasance. No run is described in the articles; the bank went into receivership and did not reopen.

Events (3)

1. May 1, 1884* Suspension
Cause
Bank Specific Adverse Info
Cause Details
Bank had no charter, long mismanagement; trustees allegedly diverted and mingled trust funds; missing notes and withheld bonds; insolvency uncovered by receiver's investigation.
Newspaper Excerpt
The Bank of Dansville suspended in May last.
Source
newspapers
2. May 19, 1884 Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
Justice Macomber, of the Supreme Court, to-day appointed Reuben Whiteman, of Dansville, receiver for property of the late Bank of Dansville.
Source
newspapers
3. December 1, 1884* Other
Newspaper Excerpt
The receiver finds that there are nearly $80,000 of notes missing from the bank... liabilities of the bank are $199,883.34 and reported assets $180,059.55; cash on hand in the bank is $120.
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (3)

Article from New-York Tribune, May 20, 1884

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

THROUGH NEW-YORK STATE. A RECEIVER FOR THE DANSVILLE BANK. IT IS CHARGED THAT THE FUNDS HAVE BEEN DIVERTED BY THE TRUSTEES. [BY TELEGRAPH TO THE TRIBUNE.1 ROCHESTER, May 19.-Justice Macomber, of the Supreme Court, to-day appointed Reuben Whiteman, of Dansville, receiver for property of the late Bank of Dansville. The bank was organized in 1838, with a capital of $150,000. In 1865 the directors adopted a resolution to discontinue, and a dividend of 80 per cent was paid on the capital 'stock. In 1869 the directors adopted a resolution to resume, and authorized the withdrawal of the notice of an intention to'close the business. In 1872 the directors again resolved to close the business of the bank, and authorized L. C. Woodruff and Luther Grant to pay its debts, return its circulating notes, etc. The Bank Department finally closed up its relations with the bank. The directors became trustees for the creditors and stockholders entitled to the possession and control of its [property and assets and charged with the duty of paying its debts and dividing among is shareholdetrs the residue of its property. Conrad Welch was the owner of fifty shares of stock, upon which he had received 80 per cent, and upon (which there remained due th e amount of $1,000, besides surplus profits. It is further alleged that the trustees, contrary to their duties as such, have neglected to convert the property and assets of the bank into money, and divide it among the persons entitled to it. but have suffered some of their number to use the property of the bank in the prosecution of their private banking enterprise, in discounting notes and bills, receiving deposits of money from individuals and firms, and of issuing certificates of deposit. using the name of the Bank of Dansville for such business, and mingling the trust funds with their own. It is also claimed that they have wasted the property, so that the depositors who present their checks are not paid. The appointment of a receiver was asked for, that the (trustees may be made responsible for any loss that may have accrued by their neglect of duty. It is not known what the exact financial condition of the bank is. It is est1mated that the deposits amount to about $240,000, obtained largely from women and farmers in that section.


Article from The Sun, December 7, 1884

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

ENTERPRISING BANKERS. An Lasight Into the Way the Bank of Dansville was Managed. HORNELLSVILLE N.Y., Dec. 3.-The Bank of Dansville suspended in May last. It was simply a bank of deposit. and supposed to be one of the soundest institutions in western New York. Its patrons at the time it closed its doors did not know that it had not for years been responsible to either State or national banking laws. for it had no charter. its business as a chartered Sta e bank having been closed up years ago. Its depositors were women, children, farmers. and mechanics, who had about $250.000 in the hands of the bank when it falled. As bad as the condition of the bank was reported when it failed. the public were not prepared for the actual condition of the institation as revealed by the receiver's investigation. just completed. The bank was under the control of L. C. Woodruff. Luther Grant. Alonzo Bradner. and A. H. Bradner. Woodruff 18 the extensive paper dealer of Bunaio, The other parties are his brothers-in-law. The receiver finds that there are nearly $80,000 of notes missing from the bank. The cash balances had not been posted in the ledger since July, 1879. Besides the $80,000 in notes which were not delivered to tue receiver by the cashier. there were $5,000 in bonds also kept back. The liabilities of the bank are $199,8$3.34. and reported assets $180,059.55. of which $88,783 is represented by the notes of Woodruff. the Bradners. the Woodruff Paper Company. and others interested in the business schemes of the bank's managers. The eash on hand 111 the bank is $120 The value of the notes mentioned is said to be merely speculative. and that of the missing notes is not known. Proceedings have been begun to recover the missing papers. As late as May 14 Woodruff published a statement declaring that the bank was perfectly sound. and that any one of the stockholders could pay its indebitedness. On the 234 of May the bank went into the hands of a receiver. Many depositors will be ruined by the failure unless assets or responsibility other than that already known can be established. Unsightly face eruptions speedily cured by one bottle Dr. Campbell - Lotion 11 Gauzenmuller


Article from New-York Tribune, September 10, 1887

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

DANSVILLE'S BROKEN BANKS. HEAVY LIABILITIES AND NO ASSETS. -HSVM JV INGTON-HOW POOR PEOPLE WERE VICTIMIZED. SHI ao V ] . eq 01 stuees PLACE STATE "2 ades kind of cradle of Napoleons of Finance," remarked a prominent citizen to-day; and recent events turnish ample foundation for the statement. Ferdinand Ward was born not far from here; and his method of con. add Build 07 $8 08 becouses Suijueq U Suppoup collapse with large liabilities and no assets appears to be the favorite one in Dansville. Three years ago the citizens were startled by the tailure of the Bank of Dansville, owned by the Bradner family, and now the only remaining bank, that owned by the Faulkner family, bas gone the same way. The first faiture swept away about $200,000 of the earnings of the townspeople, and Ward himself could not have done the work better, as there proved to be practically no assets. The money of widows and -dtsip new business our 10 the BB Пом we sueqdao peared no one knew where. What brought about the failure was not discloseu, but the bank officials have managed to live in good style ever since. They were indicted, as they continued to receive deposits long after the bank's insolvency, according to its books. But only President Bradner has yet been tried. He was convicted and sentenced to State Prison, and for a few days was actually behind the iron bars. But he had abundance Of money with which to employ able counsel, and like u Jake" Sharp, he managed in that way to get a stay pending an appeal for a new trial. The General Term decided against him, but the case is still pending before the Court of Appeals, and in the meantime President ano drinks oup up u! daily, while his associates have not yet been tried. oqm new our quith deeling up Palay 9,MBT 041, "gutted" the Bank of Dansville appears to have contributed largely in bringing on the heads of the people here another similar disaster. The Bradners and the Faulkners were the two old and leading tamilies of the place, both supposed to be rich. They have long dominated it in business and politics, making it a Democratic town in polities, and owing to their monopoly of business facilities exerted an influence which retarded its growth in a commercial 7841 thele 04 enp SUM 11 *08098 Dansville is not on the direct line of the Erie road to Rochester instead of on a small branch running down from Avon and ending here. They had an interest in the old canal which made it undesirable to them to have a railroad come this way. Manufactures have been discouraged, 80 that it it were not for the Sanatorium, a splendid fire-proof building on the hillside, accommodating 400 patients or guests, Dansville would seldom be heard of by the outside world. The Bradners owned one bank and the Faulkners the other. Both have gone down in disgrace. President Bradner 18 under the shadow of the State Prison and President Faulkner is wanted by the Sherift, but cannot be found and is reported to be in Canada. Up to this time no oue except the bank officials and vossibly the bank examiner knows the full extent of the disaster brought on the place by the failure of the First National Bank, owned by the Faulkners. -YO you seep 11 " 0000000 reach Procebly II!" 11 ang имоня SE 181 08 assets, our 01 BV 'mns that peep you op FIND U 88 deposites ous pus 'evou 9.18 there 08 u! lind siq1 to reliters OM 7700 e 108 07 cape -deems 0094 10 place e u! 'ewn . short ing out of existence all its banking facilities, might #11 10 Suven 01 disabler Bu:iq 01 experted 00 men, but 80 far these has not been a failure. Bat there are many cases of great distress among poor people. Several employes of the Sanatorium who had the savings of years deposited in the bank lose their all. A poor widow lost $1,200, all she bad. Another widow who had, atter years of waiting. been altowed a pension, had just received the arrears and "11" 11 loses 08/100 10 "4" "Mueq or,1 UI 11 persoded though the officials knew when they received the wood V '01878 11 107 аелен prom eys 1441 Aenour man had just sold his house and deposited the money, and numerous cases of the kind ate daily coming to light. The circumstances connected with this failure are pus ouo Drevious eq: JO redection Touxe ue assome Requires ent 49 percedxe SEM 11 the group ou There were rumors for weeks, not to say months, of the weakness of the bank, but tue people put conup pus others[s] 811 10 statement UJOMS eqf at couepy the examinations conducted under the Controiler of the Currency at Washington. They were grievously misled by the department at Washington, and it is evident that it would be far better to abolish the examinations conducted under Controller Trenholm it that up pus 0880 this "II se BE OJB short of the Fidelity Bank at Cincinnati. From the toundation of the First National Bank in 1864 up to March last, it had on deposit $35,000 of the Canal Sinking Fund. Controller Chapin withdrew this money nearsolvency eq1 94 because oNe x19 &; of the bank. And yet the examiner from Washington came here after the withdrawal of that money and reported the bank as in good condition. The last published statement gave the condition of the bank at the close of business May 13, and showed resources of $145,465 to meet $37,777 of deposits subject to 41 "}jsoden 40 cortinents pummer 009'98 pas now turns out that the deposits, instead of being $43,000, were at the time of the failure about $200,000 and the resources an unknown quantity. As the department at Washington has taken no measures to institute criminal proceedings-the depositors having done all that has been done in that direction -the people here want to know it the Washington authorities think it no crime to swear to false statements. James Faulkner swore :0 that statement as president, and the names of Lester B. Faulkner, our uo words Milliams 'H 3 pus somer sworn statement as directors. Lester B. Faulkner, who since his effort to boom Roswell P. Flower for President has not been heard of in State politics, was one of the principal stockholders and directors in the bank. He asserts now that he disposed of his stock some time ago to his brother, and that he did not know much about the bank's business and that he did one euros 0883 TRUE "I statements 1881 on uSe you must have torged his name. But the people here do not appear disposed to let General Faulkner escape liability. notwithstanding these statements on his part He seems to have retained sufficient interest to -intodds one thd pus A11 01 01 or ment of a receiver, and Mr. Getman, the bank examiner now here. appears to be his warm friend. The day the bank closed its doors mortgages were recorded in the County Clerk's office covering for their full value all the property owned by President Fauikner Last September he gave a mortgage for $10,000 on part of this property to James W. Wadsworth for borrowed money. Mr. Faulkner, as a special tavor, asked Mr. Wadsworth not to record the siq DAVE pus "yneq eqf the pinom " SB "an The 909 prom ou the Jonoy 10 prom was fully protected. Mr. Wadsworth trusted Mr. Faulkner's bonor, only to discover while absent in the email our Faulditer Prosident 7541 18PM property for its full value to another person, which syruom 1841 10 peaqu recorded SRM before to Mr. Wadsworth. Some of the books of the bank were carted away at night after the failure, and the index to the big ledger was found by the roadside