Article Text
Tuesday, March 29, 1910. The Eureka Bank Failure The Sentinel says that the closing of the Eureka County Bank filled the people of that community with consternation. This feeling, it says, was owing to the fact that nearly every man, woman and child in Eureka was financially interested either directly or indirectly. We doubt if another community of the size of this can be found in the state that has been as seriously affected as has this by the suspension of business by the Eureka County Bank. Not only people : of large means, but those who possessed meager sums of money had nearly every dollar they owned in this bank. These include business men, capitalists, widows, and even small children. The tying up of nearly all the available money in this community has paralyzed business here, and the people stand around and wonder what the final outcome will be. They do not discuss the washouts on the E. & P. Railway, neither do they appear to care when the Wells Fargo Company will bring here the three or four tons of express matter consigned to Eureka that has been lying at Palisade for the past month, their minds being centered on the financial disaster. To add to the distress of the people they were unable to obtain any information regarding the affairs of the suspended bank further than the statement made by Cashier C. H. Gorman that there were sufficient funds in the bank when it closed to pay the depositors over thirty cents on the dollar. Telegrams sent to Oscar J. Smith, president of the bank, who is now at Reno, remained unanswered up to Friday night. According to the statement in the complaint filed by the attorneygeneral the deposits amount to $319,892.36; the liabilities are $486,841.16 and the assets are $285,968.73. Acording : to this statement the bank will be able to pay 50 odd cents on the dollar of its deposits. On Saturday, Judge Breen summoned a grand jury to meet on April 7th to investigate the affairs of the bank. A Sentinel reporter asked Judge Breen if he had anything to say in regard the oalling of the grand jury. The Judge replied: "Not for the present. That information had reached him semiofficially which he considered amply sufficient to demand investigation at the hands of a grand jury. That