Article Text
GOING TO LAW OVER A RAILWAY SCHEME. SEEKING TO RESTRAIN THE DISPOSAL OF RICHMOND AND ALLEGHANY BONDS. In Supreme Court. Special Term. Part I. yesterday. Judge O'Brien heard the opening of the case of David II. Gould against George I. Seney, Samuel Shethar, the Metropolitan Bank, and the Ohio Central Railroad This is an action for the appointment of a receiver, an accounting, and an injunction restraining the de fendants from using or disposing of Richmond and Alleghany Railroad bonds. hold as security by defendants for a loan made from a syndicate fund subscribed to by the complainant and others. The scheme, which was planned in 1881, was to consolidate the Ohio Central Railroad. the Atlantic and Northwestern. and the Richmond and Alleghany. none of which roads were paying, and, by a connecting link, bridging the Ohio River, and, including branch roads, to form a trunk line from Toledo, Ohio, to Richmond, Va For this purpose George I. Seney and Samuel Shethar were appointed a committee to collect subscriptions to the amount of $5,000,000, profits being expected only in case the plan was successful. Shethar and Seney succeeded in collecting the amount. $2,400,000 of which was to be raised by the Ohio Central stockholders, $600,000 by those of the Atlantic and Northwestern, and $2,000,000 by those of the Richmond and Alleghany. It is charged in the complaint that the committee conspired to turn over to themselves. as directors of the Ohio Central, the uncompleted "River Division," which was to be the connecting link: that they wrong. fully appropriated $2,000,000; that they loaned $1,250,000 to the Richmond and Alleghany, of which Shethar was a director. while that road was insolvent, and $500,000 to the Ohio Central. of which Seney was a director, though the money had been raised as a construction fund. All these transactions were carried on through the Metropolitan Bank, of which Seney was president. As collateral security for the Richmond and Alloghany Road. Messrs. Seney and Shethar recelved $2,000,000 worth of the bonds of that road. and the suit, in part, is brought to stop the defendants from disposing of that security. The case has an added interest in the fact that Calvin S. Brice was one of the managers of the scheme, and that William H. Barnum figures in the case as a director of the Ohio Central Railroad. Counsel yesterday merely opened the case.