Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
U. S. BANK A FAILURE Washington, Nov. 29.-That the United States has had two unsuccessful experiences at running banks, and should, therefore, act slowly in considering Wall Street's central government bank idea, is being urged by the small bankers of the country, who are avowedly antagonistic to the program of Senator Aldrich. The country bankers are directing attention to the fact that the greatest obstacle in Canada's struggle to develop has been her antiquated systerm of big central banks with branches in every country town, through which all surplus deposits are centralized in the large citires. The Canadian merchant or manufacturer in the outlying town has been unable to secure bank accomodations needed in his business, while idle money from his own town, which a locally owned bank would gladly have loaned him, has been sent to the head offices of the big city bank with a local branch, perhaps to be invested in a far distant place to earn dividends for the stockholders. The year 1791 marked the first bank of the United States. In that year Congress chartered a bank for 20 years. Its methods brought about, 18 years later, the first bank panic in this country. Bribery and corruption in political affairs were the domi nant features of the government's first experience in banking. In 1817 a second United States bank came into existence. Within a short time it had 18 branches. In No. vember, 1818, it was insolvent. Forty Congressmen who held stock in the institution, however, enabled it to continue business. For the following five years there was keen financial distress throughout the country. In 1832 President Jackson vetoed a renewal of the bank's charter, the bank retaliating with coercive measures. I: contracted the money markets and caused great distress. Other banks sprung up. The United States bank continued operations under a charter obtained by bribery from the state of Pennsylvania, reissuing all of its old notes. The crash came in 1837, when 100 New York firms went to the wall in one month. Every bank in the city suspended. Congress was forced to pass an act forbidding the Pennsylvania Bank of the United States from using the notes of the old United States bank. Then the New York banks resumed business. But the reckless operations of the financiers who owned the United States bank brought on disaster. Oct. 19, 1839. it failed, carrying to ruin 343 of the 850 banks in the Union and causing sixty-two to suspend for a time. Its debt to the bank of England alone was $23,000,000, and the failure, coupled with the consequent ren pudiation of indebtedness by several states, destroyed American credit abroad. In spite of the assurance given by Senator Aldrich in his speeches in the west, that politics will play no 1 part in a central government bank, the small bankers are apprehensive [ lest the contrary prevail. They can hardly conceive that it would be in I keeping with the game of politics for any party to set up an institution such as a great government bank without manning it with politicians, as only by taking advantage of such opportunities are great political machines built up. :