12494. Mohall State Bank (Mohall, ND)

Bank Information

Episode Type
Suspension → Closure
Bank Type
state
Start Date
June 4, 1927
Location
Mohall, North Dakota (48.763, -101.513)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini
Short Digest
6d52a39d

Response Measures

None

Description

Newspaper items (June 4, 1927) refer to W. H. McIntosh as receiver of the Mohall State Bank, indicating the bank was in receivership/closed. No articles mention a prior depositor run or a suspension announcement; receivership implies permanent closure/receiver assignment, so classified as suspension_closure.

Events (1)

1. June 4, 1927 Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
W. H. McIntosh, receiver of the Mohall State Bank, a corporation, Defendants and Respondents
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (2)

Article from The Bismarck Tribune, June 4, 1927

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

# From McIntosh County Jacob Kosel, Plaintiff and Appellant vs. First National Bank of 'Ashley, North Dakota, Defendant and Respondent Syllabus: (1) The federal statute known as the "Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act" is applicable to proceedings in state courts. (2) Where the pleadings show affirmatively that the cause of action set forth in the complaint accrued June 10, 1919, and the action was not commenced until September 18, 1925, but that from March 27, 1918, to November 26, 1919, the plaintiff was absent from the state in the military service of the United States during the late war, plaintiff is entitled to deduct such period of his military service in computing the time when the bar of the statute of limitations becomes effective as a defense. (3) Under the foregoing state of facts it was error to sustain the objection of the defendant to the introduction of any testimony on the part of the plaintiff, and to dismiss the case on the theory that the pleadings showed affirmatively the action was barred by the statute of limitations. Appeal from the district court of McIntosh county, Hon. George M. McKenna, judge. Reversed. Opinion of the court by Burr, judge. Wishek & Wishek, Ashley, N. D., and Lauder & Lauder, Wahpeton, N. D., attorneys for appellant. J. A. Mackoff, Ashley, N. D., and Curtis & Remington, Lisbon, N. D., attorneys for respondent. # From Bottineau County Charles Berggren, Plaintiff and Appellant vs. Daniel F. Callahan, et al, Defendants Mohall State Bank, a corporation, and W. H. McIntosh, receiver of the Mohall State Bank, a corporation, Defendants and Respondents Syllabus: 1. Callahan executed and delivered to defendant bank two promissory notes, one for $2,000 and one for $1,500, each secured by a mortgage on the same land. The notes and mortgages were simultaneously executed and delivered. The bank recorded both mortgages, and sold the $2,000 mortgage to plaintiff. Plaintiff's mortgage was recorded six minutes later than the other. On bringing this action to foreclose his mortgage, plaintiff alleged that the bank falsely represented his mortgage to be a first mortgage lien, and prayed for judgment decreeing his mortgage to be a prior and superior lien to the mortgage held by the bank. For reasons stated in the opinion, plaintiff failed to establish fraud. Appeal from the district court of Bottineau county, Hon. A. G. Burr, judge. Action to foreclose mortgage, and for decree adjudging mortgage to be a first lien. Plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. Opinion of the court by Englert, district judge. Burr, judge, being disqualified, did not participate; Hon. M. J. Englert, judge of the First judicial district, sitting in his stead. George I. Rodsater, Mohall, N. D., attorney for plaintiff and appellant. J. J. Weeks, Bottineau, N. D., attorney for defendants and respondents.


Article from The Bismarck Tribune, June 4, 1927

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

# THE BISMARCK TRIBUNE agic Hands plaintiffs made by the lower court was affirmed. In the case of Grant Smith as administrator of the estate of Herbert Winifred vs. O. P. Fladeland, appealed by the former from the Mountrail county district court, the supreme court reversed the lower tribunal and remanded the case for the lower court to determine the share held by Fladeland in certain property. The record of the case shows that Fladeland, Borst's father-in-law, advanced money to prevent foreclosure on property purchased by Borst on a contract prior to his death. A deed for the property then was made out to Fladeland. The supreme court held that Fladeland should share in the property to the extent of the amount which he had invested but that the title should have gone to the Borst estate. No Fraud Shown Affirming the Bottineau county district court, the supreme court held that a mortgage on certain real estate, held by W. H. McIntosh as receiver of the Mohall State Bank, was superior to a mortgage on the same property held by Charles Berggren. Berggren contended that the mortgage, which he claimed to be a prior lien, was sold to him by the bank and that it was represented by the bank as a first mortgage. The mortgage held by the bank was recorded six minutes before that sold to Berggren. that steers an airplane ly after the pilot sets it was demonstrated recent-ver Field, Santa Monica, e instrument, a gyroscope is shown above with Pilot tton who flew with his the controls. Night flying increase the invention's After reviewing the evidence the court held that Berggren had failed to establish fraud on the part of the bank.