Article Text
# High Court Rules on Jangula vs. Bobb Case Reversing the Burleigh county district court, the supreme court has held that where a defendant in a garnishment proceeding defends the action on the ground that the indebtedness of the garnishee is exempt under the law, it is not necessary that he set out in his answer a statement of the personal property owned by him. The decision was given in the case of Jacob L. Jangua vs. Philopena and Fred E. Bobb. When the case was heard in the Burleigh county district court a judgment for the plaintiff was entered but the supreme court reversed the decision. The supreme court has affirmed the Benson county district court in a case in which L. R. Baird, as receiver of the Farmers and Merchants Bank of Leeds, was plaintiff and the A. L. Johnson company was defendant. The case was appealed by Baird following an adverse decision of the lower court. The case grew out of adverse claims to certain land on which both the Bank and the Johnson company held liens.