Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
X-SHERIFF WINS REMOVAL APPEAL
Court Holds Former Musselshell Officer Entitled to Grand Jury Inquiry.
HELENA. Nov. it provided short cut toward the removal of former Sheriff T. G. Beasley of Musselshell county from office, Beasley is entitled to have the complaints against his official conduct investigated by a grand jury and to have trial by jury, the supreme court says, reversing the order of the district court for Musselshell county, which removed the sheriff from office some months ago While the sheriff was charged with failure to perform his duties, the supreme court finds that "the proof established the defendant's guilt of malfeasance in office, and therefor the action became one for the consideration and verdict of a jury. and not for determination of the court alone. A. G. McNaught, as county attorney. charged the sheriff on seven counts with wilfully refusing and failing to perform the duties of his office in neglecting to arrest for bribery, gambling and other offenses alleged to have been committed in his presence. The matter was threshed out in the supreme court before the trial on the question as to whether misfeasance or malfeasance was charged and decided against the sheriff. Judge Stanley E. Felt was called in from neighboring district to hear the case. The trial resulted in the removal of the sheriff
LAKE COUNTY FARMERS LOSE SUIT OVER SPUR against a group of farmers of Lake county who underwrote construction of spur for the Ronan flour mill. is ordered by the supreme court. The action reverses the district court for Lake county where the receiver of the First National bank of Ronan had brought unsuccessful suit against V. U. Le Clair and others, to recover on their note. Any oral argument which they have made with the bank under which they claim the note should have been paid by collections from other farmers at harvest time cannot be aditted in evidence in this action, the court holds. James M Swan, as bank receiver, brought suit against several signers of note to recover its value. The signers declared the money was used to build a side track to the Ronan Flour mill, in which they were interested, that numerous farmers of the district had signed notes of $100 each in favor of the mill to finance it and that the bank had agreed that, as these farmers sold their grain. $100 would be collected from each as his payment to the mill and that the sums would be credited to the mill's note to the bank, until It was retired. This agreement, they claim, the bank failed to carry out, though they allege it could have done The jury found for the defendants and the court refused new trial, whereupon the receiver appealed.