1118. National Bank of the Pacific (San Francisco, CA)

Bank Information

Episode Type
Run Only
Bank Type
national
Bank ID
7894
Charter Number
7894
Start Date
July 18, 1909
Location
San Francisco, California (37.780, -122.419)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini
Short Digest
e7d6ae2a

Response Measures

Books examined

Other: Police were called to hold back depositors; examiners investigated alleged shortage and possible embezzlement.

Description

Newspaper reports (Jul 18, 1909) describe a crowd of depositors and police being called to hold them back; an apparent run was triggered by discovery of a shortage/possible embezzlement by a paying teller (Von Meyerinck). No article mentions a suspension, receivership, or permanent closure of this bank in the provided texts.

Events (1)

1. July 18, 1909 Run
Cause
Bank Specific Adverse Info
Cause Details
Discovery of a shortage in the books and alleged embezzlement by paying teller Von Meyerinck; investigation found missing collateral and irregularities.
Measures
Police were called to hold back crowds of depositors; examiners investigated assets and shortages.
Newspaper Excerpt
the police were called upon to keep back the crowds of depositors ... Had the run not been stopped at the time it was it is probable that the bank would have been declared bankrupt
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (2)

Article from The San Francisco Call, July 18, 1909

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

rived, however, the police were calle opon'to keep back the crowds of de positors and the newsboys who wer oudly crying the suicide of baron vo Meyerinck, former paying teller. Had the run not been stopped at th ime it was it is probable that the ban would have been declared bankrup while, according to the superintender banks, there appears to be sufficier good assets to pay all depositors dolla dollar, However, the assets hav been investigated to any exter a more thorough examination ma rove that the depositors stand to los onsiderable of their savings. Onl word of the officials of the bank a the assets and their valuation ha far been obtained by the examine HORTAGE IS ADMITTED That there is a shortage is admitte Anderson, and that at least part o he discrepancy has been traced to Vo Meyerinck comes direct from thos onnected with the bank and the exam nation. Von Meyerinck, shortly befor left the bank, according to Ira ( Hays, the paying teller, issued to him a certificate of deposit for $50 'his $500 item has been already un overed and the examiners are no earching through the books for more the place of original notes wer ound many copies of notes. Securi that had been deposited with th ank as collateral could not be foun in their places had been place leeds of trust and certified copies o leeds of trust. No trace of the money made or los the National Bank of the Pacific des ould be found. In that deal, it laimed by W. C. Hays, the depose ashier, a very good profit we nade, but no trace of the profit wa nearthed by the examiners. The controlling interest of the Na Ional Bank of the Pacific, 1,674 share bought by Hasshagen and W. ( Hays from the California safe deposi trust company, and two othe anks, for $55 a share. A portion o purchase price was paid down an when the time came to close the dea larence Grange of. the Metropoli rust company was asked to loan th noney, which he did, taking the 1,67 hares of National Bank of the Pacifi security. During the time tha range held the stock, Hays, Hasshe and Bechtel had themselves electe irectors of the National Bank of th Pacific and were beginning to perfed lans for a consolidation of the Unio tate, State savings and National Ban the Pacific, when Grange called hi FORECLOSES ON LOAN Hays and Hasshagen were unable t the loan and Grange foréclose ecuring the stock, so it is said, to a share, the amount of the loai rhile Hays and Hasshagen, it appear $19 a share on the transaction lays, however, denies that he an Iasshagen lost on the deal and main that he now holds an agreemen hereby they will realize a comfort ble profit. When he had secured pos ession of the stock, Grange had ransferred into his name and into th ames of John H. Spring and Alfre feyerstein and then called for a meet of the directors. At that meetin resignations of Hays, Hasshage Bechtel were called for and hande and Grange, Spring and Meyerstei lected to fill the vacancies. Grang demanded the resignation of Zoet Cldredge, the president, and when tha forthcoming, Grange was electe resident. When the Union state secured th ontrolling interest of the State saving commercial it was the plan to con olidate those institutions, but that ha ever been actually accomplished. In tead the assets of the two banks hav merged, and it has been the pla late to conduct all business throug he State savings and commercial. Van Meyerinck lost his position abou month ago. He was discharged by V Hays, then manager of the bank, i order to reduce expenses and becaus Hays, his actions about the ban were suspicious. "I discovered that there was a dis crepancy in Von Meyerinck's account about a month ago," said Hays yeste lay evening. "It was the duty of Has hagen to count the cash each evening and one evening we found a shortage pproximately $139: I can not remembe the exact figures. That discrepancy we assigned to natural error, as any telle liable to make in making up his cas Later I found Von Meyerinck examinin the contents of the note case, and fro that moment I decided that he mus leave the bank. The bank holds a mor rage on Von Meyerinck's Larksp property, the interest on which has ne been paid for two years. I can not sa for sure that Von Meyerinck was sho his accounts. As you know, I ha been near the bank since I had call a policeman to help me get in the vaults, and what has occurred sin that time I do not know." TRIPS TO BEACH RESORTS Hays was then questioned about se of the bank's transactions which not appear exactly right. He sa that at the time he left the bank tl necessary reserve was being carrie omething more than $8,000 in the Wes


Article from The San Francisco Call, February 7, 1910

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

chance to judge as to which one was the liar and the trickster. "I can prove by several witnesses," said Hays, "that Grange held us up for $7,500 for the loan. One night at the Thompsor-Jaulus cafe just after we had made the deal to secure the control of the National Bank of the Pacific Grange and his wife, Attorney Frank Kington and his wife and myself with my wife were dining together. During the dinner Grange leaned over to me and said, 'Hays, this must be worth something to you.' "At first could not grasp what he meant. Then I understood and asked him his price. T knew he had us in a jam. He said $5,000. but at the bank in the morning he said that would not be enough, that he would not be satisfied with less than $7,500. We had to accede to this because then we had only one hour in which to make the payment for the stock. C. T. Hasshagen and T. A. Bechtel. president and cashier of our bank. and Grange, A. L. Meyerstein and J. H. Grange, all vice presidents of the Metropolis bank, and myself were present at the meeting in the morning in the Metropolis bank when the negotiations were concluded and we gave the check for $7,500. The papers in the office of Bank Superintendent Alden Anderson will show this to be the truth. "I have a copy of the agreement whereby he was to liquidate the National Bank of the Pacific. Two other banks also wanted to liquidate it, but Grange got away with it. and now he is the man who is responsible for all my trouble. I'm going to show him up. I'll sue him for an accounting for not living up to his signed agreement to liquidate. "Even after I gave up the management Grange double crossed our bank He had promised to see our bank through in case of a run, but he quit after the first $5,000. On that $5,000 he took $20,000 security. Before this he had lent to the State savings and commercial bank, when C. P. Haag was manager, $10,000 with $12,000 security. After I had paid off $5,000 of it we required another $5,000. and he demanded and got $16,000 security." BRANDS ACCUSATIONS FALSE These accusations were branded by Grange later in the day as absolutely false. He said the loan of about $50,000 had been regularly made with interest at 6 per cent and that real estate had been given as security. He denied that there had been any "shakedown." Hays justified his conduct in overdrawing his account $1,200 by insisting that he had a perfect right to do so inasmuch as he had over $20,000 worth of stock in the bank. He added that there had been no subterfuge and that overdrafts were common in banking circles. He explained the Tiedemann transaction by saying that the saloon keeper had paid $1,000 for stock in the proposed Bank of Elmhurst, but when the Bank of San Leandro anticipated the deal and opened a branch in Elmhurst it was decided to put the money in the Union State bank and use it in the purchase of the control of the National Bank of the Pacific. Hays insisted that Tiedemann had agreed in writing to this transaction.