First National Bank - Steelville, MO

Bank Information

Episode Type: Run → Suspension → Closure
Bank Type: national
Bank ID: 8914
Charter Number: 8914
Start Date: January 30, 1933
Location: Steelville, Missouri (37.968, -91.355)

Metadata

Model: gpt-5-mini
Short Digest: 93067692

Response Measures

Full suspension, Books examined

Other: Receivership assigned; State Finance Commissioner deputies took charge.

Receivership Details

Depositor recovery rate: 75.2%
Date receivership started: 1933-01-30
Date receivership terminated: 1937-07-30
Share of assets assessed as good: 41.3%
Share of assets assessed as doubtful: 47.2%
Share of assets assessed as worthless: 11.5%

Description

Articles (Feb 2, 1933) report heavy unexpected withdrawals and a run that led the First National Bank of Steelville to close its doors, be placed in the hands of state/federal receivers, and enter liquidation. A receiver (C. L. Bollinger initially mentioned; later W. R. Brown appears as receiver in 1934 docket) was appointed and legal/receivership proceedings continued into 1934, indicating permanent closure rather than reopening.

Events (6)

1. October 12, 1907 Chartered

Source: historical_nic

2. January 30, 1933 Receivership

Source: historical_nic

3. January 30, 1933 Run

Cause: Macro News
Cause Details: Out-of-town depositors alarmed by many bank failures in St. Louis and other sections withdrew funds; rumors of a chaotic condition prompted withdrawals.
Measures: Bank officers met and decided not to open Monday; later placed in hands of state/federal receivers.
Newspaper Excerpt: the Saturday before there had been heavy wholly unexpected ... withdrawals
Source: newspapers

4. January 30, 1933 Suspension

Cause: Macro News
Cause Details: Closure followed heavy unexpected withdrawals driven by alarm over many bank failures elsewhere and rumors; bank was closed and state finance commissioner intervened to take charge and appoint deputies/receivers for liquidation.
Newspaper Excerpt: The First National Bank ... failed open its doors for business Monday morning. ... It was thought best not to open Monday.
Source: newspapers

5. February 1, 1933 Receivership

Newspaper Excerpt: Mr. C. L. Bollinger, has been assigned by the Federal Government as Receiver of the First National Bank and arrived Tues- day to enter upon his duties of liquidation.
Source: newspapers

6. February 19, 1934 Other

Newspaper Excerpt: W. R. Brown, Receiver for First National Bank ... Suit for preference. ... W. R. Brown, Receiver of the First National Bank of Steelville - Claim for Preference (court docket items).
Source: newspapers

Newspaper Articles (3)

1. February 2, 1933 Crawford Mirror Steelville, MO

Article from Crawford Mirror, February 2, 1933

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

LOCAL BANKS CLOSED MONDAY The banks here in Steelville, The First National Bank and The County Farmers Bank, each failed open its doors for business Monday morning. On the Saturday before there had been heavy wholly unexpected, on each the banks, Sunday officers bank got together and discussed the situation. They decided that the Saturday the banks would probably be resumed Monday. Therefore was thought best not to open Monday. The Farmers Bank, being bank, notice was given to the State Finance Commissioner that the bank here been closed, the sent Deputy from the Finance Department, Mr. George Freund, of Warsaw, to take temporary charge. He also takes temporary charge of the Cook Station Bank, that bank closing in fear of run on its deposits. Mr. Freund will finish his work very few days and will then relieved by Special Deputies, whose work liquidation may continue many weeks longer. Mr. Freund highly trained man the science of banking and also very splendid and courteous gentleman to meet, but we made no inquiries of him about the banks solvency, we know that his business to examine banks and not to be interviewed by press and public. The First National Bank now the hands of Mr Bollinger, of Springfield. He will probably be with for some weeks months, all depending on what condition he finds the bank to be in. Mr. Bollinger also highly specialized in finance and hard worker. His diligence and earnestness in his work radiates confidence in everyone. He is the type man who will his best. While there possibility that or both our banks may be saved resume operations later. have authority to make definite statement to that find impossible to give our readers facts and figures, decline to guesswork. However, we feel Hopeful. As to of new bank here Steelville, we can tell you but little. There appears to be some favorable sentiment for one, but prudence would seem to say, "Let's learn the exact status of the two that closed Monday. Possibly one or both of them can yet be saved. All important steps should be taken The bank Cuba has closed for 30 days and the Leasburg, Bourbon and Oak Hill banks are still business. Of course to the doors of four banks Crawford county closed for present is not pleasant sight and brings sympathy for lot of folks who now have their money tied not mention of how badly number of our bankers must feel; still our spirit as good citizens should be one courage and despair. As one of our advertisthis week has time has come when we must all pull togethThere is chance for us all pull PULLS!

2. February 2, 1933 The Steelville Ledger Steelville, MO

Article from The Steelville Ledger, February 2, 1933

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

3 BANKS CLOSE THEIR DOORS; 1 DECLARES 3O DAYS MORATORIUM. Steelville, in fact Crawford formed. County, is brought face to face with the most serious condition It may seem strange to the and while their life work in two that has ever befallen our peo- outside world that these two great financial centers is wreck- ple. It is serious from more institutions, rated as they were ed beyond repair, they retain the In arithmetic we are having division problems. We are also learning how to check division problems. than one angle, striking as it among the strongest banks of respect, the esteem and the con- does the individual, the business the State, were wrecked SO fidence of their fellowman. quickly. And here is a story And this does not end the man, the professional man-de- that is highly interesting be- situation because it extends to IV The pupils of the fourth grade language class are writing letters today. stroying our strong financial cause it absolves the banking other towns, involving at least centers and laying waste with officials and the people of this two other banks, the Cook Sta- cyclonic procedure the vital city and community of any tion Bank organized and oper- ated by the stockholders of the Our arithmetic study is long division with remainders. fluid SO necessary to sustain blame in the matter. These two Farmers Bank, closed its doors. banks were wrecked by out of The Peoples Bank at Cuba,, also V In history we are drawing maps to show the various frontier changes. man in his worldly meanderings town depositors who becoming a strong institution was forced and making possible in business and home relations that peace alarmed at SO many bank fail- ures in St. Louis and other sec- to declare a moratorim and will We are memorizing Longfellow's "The Arrow and the Song" In Elementary Science we are reading about the formation of various roads. of mind and contentment which tions of the State during the bₑ closed for 30 days. W. H. Carr is cashier of the VI In arithmetic we are studying volume. We are making our posters which were sent with our "Weekly Readers." past three weeks, withdrew Cook Station Bank, and A. J. holds life and body together. Barnett is President of the their holdings. The procedure Monday morning the two banks in this city, the Crawford was gradual and there was no Peoples Bank which he organCounty Farmers Bank, organi- way to sense any immediate ized and was the prime moving zed in 1897, and the First Na- danger because it was natural agent of its affairs since its ortional Bank, organized in 1907, to believe that it would not ganization many years ago. Two closed their doors, posting no- continue beyond the breaking better men do not live anywhere Our new outside reading books are being read with much enthusiasm. tices that the affairs of the point. But it did and we are in- two institutions were now in formed that the withdrawals as and it is quite evident that they, too, are absolved of any the hands of the State and Fed- blame in the premises. late as Saturday by out of town We wish to thank all those who contributed to our ParentTeachers Associations drive. We are anxious to receive the dodge ball which was offered to the room receiving the most members. We received $6.50. eral receivers for liquidation. customers were exceedingly There was no prearranged No one will ever know the heavy. At this writing, Wednesday the Leasburg Bank, the Bank of Bourbon and the Oak Hill Bank VII We are working on the case of nouns and pronouns in grammar. We are testing in denominate numbers for arithmetic work. Several made low scores on our first test. We expect to do better tomorrow. agonies of the men in charge of run on either bank brought are still open and doing busi- these financial centers as they fought in an uneven battle to about by rumors of a chaotic ness. It is to be hoped they stem the tide of the steady ap- condition, and to the credit of will be able to stem the tide proaching enemy, only to sur- home depositors let it be said and will not become involved render when there was no ave- in the financial disaster. that they did not participate in nue of escape. Six o'clock Sat- the withdrawals of funds. And And what is the outlook for urday evening was an hour look- their action shows the great our little city and the other VIII We are writing a pageant that is to be given before the Parent Teachers meeting February 9th. In civics we are studying the early settlements in Missouri. We are studying the agreement of pronouns with their antecedents in English. Perry Ives who has been in a is improving. H. W. Buckley, a business man of St. Francois, Mo., for many years, has leased his business to his brother and will devote his time to the banking business, being president of the newly established Flat ver Bank. ed forward to with eagerness, confidence placed in the manage- communities effected by this because each hour of the day ment of both institutions. While disaster? It is grave indeed, brought new terrors and added the tense situation is sufficient but we can minimize its effects to the perplexities of a situation to cause criticism, it is grat- if we put forth the effort. This that was becoming alarming. ifying to the officials and close is a time for strong hearts to They knew the end was near- associates to hear no blame at- collect the vital energy within that neither institution could tached to any act in the man- survive and they bent every ef- agement of the two institutions. fort to hold the fort until the God knows it is like tearing out closing hour and closing the their heart strings to see a bus- doors with a balance in the iness with which they have checking department. They been associated for more than a their body and go forth to rise above this great disaster-th most devastating ever visited upon our people, but we can rise above it and rebuild the wreck if we do not falter as new problems of rehabilitation succeeded, but this was at a quarter of a century a business confront us. Our former status low ebb in both banks. In one in which they were in reality bank they had dwindled to less slaves so eager were they to can be obtained and it behooves than $125.00, and in the other build solidly that those whose every citizen to buckle on the to less than $1,300, an amount funds were entrusted to their armor and be ready for the batincluded in a hasty receipt care would profit as a result of tle that confronts us as individof funds to the amount of $1,500 the management of the institu- uals and as a community. Your at the hour, tion. They are ditions will not benefit you but it will be a bar to recovery. The financial condition of the two banks cannot be stated at this time, but we do not look for any great losses to depositors. They are in the hands of re- ceivers appointed by the Gov- ernment and until they finish their work the outcome will not be known. Really the most serious aspect of the situation is the fact that you are deprived of funds to carry on business and finance home and other opligations, but you will to grit your teeth and bring into use energies that you have not had to call upon for several years, In other words, we will have to turn back to the days of the world War when we conserved and brought into use every facility possible to accumulate sufficient to keep the wolf from the door. And we succeeded in those stren- uous days, and We can do it NOW. Where there is a will there is a way, SO start today with a determination to rise above the adversity that has so unexpect- edly come upon us. Mr. C. L. Bollinger, has been assigned by the Federal Govern- ment as Receiver of the First National Bank and arrived Tues- day to enter upon his duties of liquidation. Mr. Bollinger is not only an expert in his line of work but we find him to be a very pleasant and courteous gentle- man.

3. February 8, 1934 Crawford Mirror Steelville, MO

Article from Crawford Mirror, February 8, 1934

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

CRAWFORD COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT DOCKET, FEB. 1934 MONDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 1934 No. 422-State of Mo vs. Sherman Doyle-Robbery. No. 558-State of Mo. vs. Fred Lutz-Carrying Concealed Weapon. No. 570-State of Mo. vs. Roy Coffman-Stealing parts of a Motor Vehicle No. 574-State of Mo. vs. W. F. Arnett-Concealing loans from Bank Examiners and Directors. No. 594-State of Mo. vs. J. E. Davis-Issuing bogus check. No. 595-State of Mo. V.S. Harvey W. McNatt-Destruction of property No.. 598-State of Mo. VS. W. F. Arnett-Forgery. No. 599-State of Mo. vs. W. F. Arnett-Forgery. No. 600-State of Mo. vs. W. F. Arnett-Forgery. No. 601-State of Mo. VS. Steve Pennock-Wife and child abandonment. No. 602-State of Mo. vs. Lee Dyer-Assault with intent to ravish. No. 603-State of Mo. VS. Mildred Madglin-Permitting intoxicating liquor on premises covered by beer permit. No. 605-State of Mo. VS. Fred Davis-Possess and keep for sale, corn whiskey, hootch and moonshine. No. 614-State of Mo. vs. Ray Woolsey-Child abandonment. No. 615-State of Mo. vs. Fred Huitt-Burglary and larceny. No. 618-State of Mo. VS. Troy Farrar-Statutory rape. TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 1934 No. 619-State of Mo. vs. Farris Sappington-Manufacturing intoxicating liquor. No. 620-State of Mo. vs. Henry Cline-Statutory rape. No. 621-State of Mo. vs. Floyd Bell and Willie Bell-Stealing timber. No. 622-State of Mo. VS. George Evans-Statutory rape. No. 623-State of Mo. vs. Paul Farrar-Statutory rape. No. 625-State of Mo. VS. Guy Matthews-Statutory rape. No. 626-State of Mo. VS. Delmar E. Coleman-Common assault. No. 627-State of Mo. VS. W. F. Arnett-Embezzlement and Larceny. No. 628-State of Mo. vs. W. F. Arnett-Embezzlement and Larceny. No. 629-State of Mo. VS. W. F. Arnett-Embezzlement and Larceny. No. 630-State of Mo. VS. W. F. Arnett-Embezzlement and Larceny. No. 631-State of Mo. vs. W. F. Arnett-Embezzlement and Larceny. No. 632-State of Mo. VS. W. F. Arnett-Falsifying Bank Records. No. 633-State of Mo. VS. W. F. Arnett-Falsifying Bank Records. No. 634-State of Mo. vs. W. F. Arnett-Forgery in the First Degree and False Entries in Books of Corporation. No. 635-State of Mo. VS. J. E. Troutt-Felonious Assault. No. 636-State of Mo. vs. Hugh Long-Grand larceny. No. 637-State Mo. vs. Dewey Ransom, Radius McCoy and Walter Dierking-Stealing Domestic Fowls in Night time. No. 638-State of Mo. vs. Leroy Peters-Petit Larceny. No. 639-State of Mo. WS. George Knight-Carrying a concealed weapon. No. 640-State of Mo. VS. Charles Connor-Making a false affidavit WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1934 No. 616-In the Matter of the Assignment of W. J. Underwood-Assignment. No. 791-Francis Spencer vs. Tressa Davis-Partition. No. 1459-Indian Creek Land Co. VS. Mary C. Bradford et al Ejectment. No. 1468-Alice Wymer et al VS. Elby Wymer et al-Partition No. 1477-A. W. Ettinger VS. A. L. Neubert et al-Ejectment No. 1489-Mary F. Gilliam et al vs. Edward W. Saegar and Ollie Marie Saegar-Suit to perfect title. No. 1498-Virgil Starks and Ethel Starks VS. Unknown Heirs Eugenia Cooper, Deceased-Suit to perfect title. No. 1535- State of Mo. ex rel State Highway Commission, VS. H. L. Moutray et al-Condemnation petition. No. 1578-Rainey Britton VS. Everett Halbert-Suit on account. No. 1638-In the Matter of Charles P. Keidel, dec.-Petition upon appointment of new Trustee under the Will of Charles Keidel. No. 1638-A-In the Matter of Pauline W. Keidel, dec.-Petition for appointment of new Trustee under the Will of Pauline W. Keidel. No. 1638-B-In the Matter of Pauline G. Sattler, dec.-Petition for appointment of new Trustee under the Will of Pauline G. Sattler. No. 1643-Ellen M. Bivins VS. R. M. Blanton-Damages. No. 1644-State of Mo. ex rel State Highway Commission, VS. Hugh L. White et al-Condemnation. No. 1655-Everett E. Cook VS. Magoria M. Cook-Divorce. No. 1657-Cuba Consolidated School District No. 1, a Corp., Carl et al-Petition for an injunction. No. 1660-Belgrade State Bank, a Corp., vs. Crawford Coun- ty Farmers Bank, defunct corp.-Preferred Claim. No. 1661-A. McKinney VS. J. Lynch-Action on note. No. 1670-Edgar A. Bain et al VS. Harvey W. McNatt et alSet aside deed. No. 1671-County of Crawford VS. O. H. Moberly et al-Suit for preferred claim. No. 1672-Roberts-Judson Lumber Co. vs. Wm. P. Clonts et al-Mechanics Lein. No. 1679-Glengarry Realty Co., a corp., VS. Jefferson L. Midyett-Petition for an Ejectment. No. 1683-Mrs. S. E. Parker VS. W. F. Arnett-Petition for Money Converted. No. 1684-Florence Bouse vs. Letha Rohrer et al-For Dam- ages. No. 1688-0. H Moberly, Finance Com. of the State of Mo., and J. T. Haley, Deputy Finance Com. in charge of the Crawford County Farmers Bank, vs. Crawford County, Missouri-Suit on County Warrants. No. 1689-In the Matter of the Crawford County Farmers Bank, Dora Casebolt, by R. S. Barr, Curator-Petition for preference. No. F. Roberts, L. M. Coffman and W. R. Judson J. E. Davis et al-Suit on notes No. 1691-0. H. Moberly et al vs. P. A. Watson et al-Suit on account. No. 1695-Roberts-Judson Lumber Co. vs. Alice MorganNo. 1698-J. B. Elam vs. Mable A. White-Suit on account. No. 1700-In the Matter of the Estate of Mary Halfaker, dec. Chas. Contested Will. No. 1706-John Mansfield VS. Oliver Travis and John W. Davis-Damages. No. 1708-Robert Updike VS. Oliver Travis and J. W. Thomas -Damages. No. 1710-St. Louis, San Francisco Railroad Co. vs. J. W Hughes et al-Suit on account. No. 1717-R. P. Joyce VS. W. E. Ennis-Suit to revive judgment. No. 1720-Glengarry Realty Co., a corp., VS. Clarence Setzer and Logan Setzer-Petition for an injunction. No. 1722-Margaret Bennett VS. Roy Bennett-Divorce. No. 1725-Edward E. Roberts VS. Blanche Roberts-Divorce. No. 1727-Bessie Pennock VS. Steve Pennock-Divorce. No. 1730-0. J. Stewart VS. County of Crawford, State of Mo.-Suit on Account No. 1731-State ex rel Prosecuting Attorney VS. Andrew Kessler-Quo Warranto. THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1934 No. 1732-Fannie Metcalf vs. Ed Peak et al-Suit in partition No. 1733-W. T. Whaley vs. Banner Truck Line Inc-Suit on Account. No. 1734-Peoples Bank of Cuba, a corp., VS. C. B. Pounds al-Suit on note. No. 1735-Alice Spurgeon et al VS. Elmer Ferris et al-Suit partition. No. 1736-EHa Grace Kemp VS. Unknown heirs of Calvin Wy. mer, dec., al-Suit to quiet title. No. 1737- W. R. Brown, Receiver for First National Bank, VS. H. D. Yeary and M. B. Yeary- Suit on note. No. 1738-H. H. Lark VS. Wm. J. Armbruster-Petition for an injunction. No. 1739-E. R. Woodward VS. Meramee Ice and Fuel Co.Petition. No. 1749-James A. Reed and Martha Reed VS. Heirs of Wm. H. Harrison et al-Suit to quiet title No. 1741-Alice Harrison et al VS. Etta Dixon et al-Suit to quiet title No. 1742-0. H. Moberly, Commissioner of Finance and J. T. Haley, Special Deputy Commissioner, VS. Henry Sellers and Rose Sellers-Suit on note. No. 1743-Walter W. Rumer V.S. L. Herman Seitz-Suit on note. No. 1744-J J. Martin VS. Charles Lamore-Damages No. 1745-R. O. Denton VS. A. R. Eades et al-Suit on note. No. 1746-City of Steelville, Mo., Municipal Corp., by Lee Pounds, City Collector, VS. W. R. Brown, Receiver of the First National Bank of Steelville-Suit for preference. No. 1747-0. H. Moberly, Com. of Finance et al vs. W. F. Arnett and the Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York -Suit on bond. No. 1748-0. H. Moberly, Commissioner of Finance, et al vs. W. F. Arnett and Hartford Accident Co. et al-Suit on Bond. No. 1749 Steelville Consolidated School District No. 2 vs. W. R. Brown, Receiver of the First National Bank of Steelville- Claim for Preference. No. 1750-0. T. Coleman VS. Sherman Short-Petition to Cancel Note. No. 1751-Albert Frederickson VS. A. Weigle-Action on Breach of Promise. No. 1752-A. S. Aloe Co., a Corp., VS. F. O. Anderson-Suit Account. No. 1753-W. R. Brown, Receiver of First National Bank of Steelville vs. L. D. Brand-Suit on Notes. No. 1754-Simmons Hardware Co., a Corp., Inc. VS. L. H. Lewis-Suit on account. No. 1755-Freida Bandy VS. Charles Bandy-Divorce. No. 1756-Sadie Edna Wilkinson VS. Clemath WilkinsonDivorce. No. 1757-Catherine Reese VS. Don Reese—Divorce. No. 1758-Mrs. Martha Dunlap vs. Labe V. Dunlap-Divoree. No. 1759-Edgar G. Plange VS. Lorene Plange-Divorce. No. 1760-Ruth F. Spurgeon vs. Jewell E Spurgeon-Divoree No. 1761-Elsie Hunter VS. Harry Hunter-Divorce. No. 1762-Mary Elizabeth Lewis V.S. Isaac William LewisDivorce No. 1763-W P. Key VS. Margaret Key-Divorce. No. 1764-Anna S. Lambert Clifford T. Lambert—Divorce No. 1765-Ella Counts VS. Frank Counts-Divorce. No. 1766-James E. Nichols VS. Mattie Nichols-Divorce. No. 1767-Maud Mullen VS. Charley Mullen-Divorce. FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1934-Preferred Claim No. 7-J. F. Baloun, Aline Baloun, a Minor, VS. Crawford County Farmers Bank No. 9-E. W. Gravatt, Cashier Bank of Leasburg VS Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 10-Clifton Beckham vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank No. 11-H. A. Branson Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 17-Harry Clymer, guardian for Henry Clymer, a minor, vs. County Farmers Bank. No. 18-Harry Clymer, guardian of Jack Clymer, a minor, VS. Crawford County Farmers Bank No. 19-Harry Clymer, guardian of Helen Clymer, a minor, Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 20-Harry Clymer, guardian of Davis Clymer, a minor, V.S. Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 22-Roy Clymer, guardian of Francis Clymer, a minor, vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 23-Harry Clymer, Curator of the estate of Madeline Mitchell Plankey and William Thomas Mitchell, minors, Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 24-Gertrude Fahey, Natural guardian of Francis Fahey, a minor, Crawford County Farmers Bank No. 28-First National Bank, Steelville, Missouri, vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 31 -Roberts- Lumber Co., by W. R. Judson, vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank No. 32-Roberts-Judson Lumber Co., by W. R. Judson, vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 33-Helen Jackson vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 36-Margaret C. Jones, Natural guardian of Catherine Jones, minor, vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank No. 38-Margaret C. Jones, Natural guardian of Rose Mary Jones, minor, vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 44-E. N. Kelly and Lilly V. Kelly vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 45-W J. Kreamalmeyer, Natural guardian of Bobby M. Kreamalmeyer, a minor, vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 48-Sarah E. Parker vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank No. 50-C. H MeIntosh, guardian and curator of the estate of Bartley Haley, a minor, VS. Crawford County Farmers Bank No. J. Barnett, President of the Peoples Bank of Cuba, Mo., vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 3. Stewart, County Supt. VS. Crawford County Farmers Bank No. 75-Sherman Short VS. Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. Arnett VS. Crawf County Farmers Bank. Clymer, Attorney for Ludie Halbert, vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 81 Sherman Short vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank. Steelville Basketball Association, C. H. MeIntosh, Custodian, vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 86-Harry M. Keys vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 87-Roy Clymer, Attorney for Harry M. Keys, vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 89-Alice Schwieder VS. Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 92-James T. Huitt vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank No. 118-Mary A. Judson VS. Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 119-Flora Wright and T. L. Wright vs. O. H. Moberly, Finance Com. of the State of Mo. et al. No. 120-Barbara Scott, Natural Guardian for Barbara Scott, minor, Crawford County Farmers Bnk. No. 121-Stanley Scott, a minor, vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank No. 122-J. Shadburn, Natural Guardian for Wills Scott Shadburn, vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank No. 125-C. R. Gibbs, Natural Guardian for Wallace Gibbs, VS. Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 126-Arthur Houston Taff, minor, VS. Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 127-E. E. Brand, Natural Guardian of E.J. Brand, minor Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 128-J T. Wilson vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 129-Stella Kehner VS. Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 130-Ava Farris, Natural Guardian for Juda Farris, vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank No. 131-Geo. West, Guardian for Edward West, vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank. No. 132-George West vs. Crawford County Farmers Bank.