Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
MONEY AND BUSINESS. The remarkable statement published by the banks on Saturday, at a time when the stock market seemed to have commenced a vigorous recovery, caused uncertainty of feeling and irregular trading for the rest of the day. It was called 'inexplicable" by many, because the decrease in resources, $28,352,300, did not compare with the decrease in deposit liabilities, $20,625,400. But it is not difficult to perceive that the issue of about $8,000,000 loan certificates, not included anywhere in the cash reported, and the deduction of a corresponding amount of securities from the loan averages of the individual banks, might account for the discrepancy. In itself, the large decrease in cash held would not have caused much surprise. It had been known for some time that large amounts had been withdrawn from the banks, both by other banks in the interior and by savings banks and individual depositors, nor did such demands necessarily imply distrust, at a time when many institutions throughout the country were obliged to provide against the sudden assaults of unreasoning panic. The fact appears that, notwithstanding this natural drain and the great shrinkage in the credits of brokers and operators, the decrease in amount of deposits had been less than one-tenth since May 3, after allowance for the stoppage of the Marine Bank. Rightly considered, this shows a remarkable confidence in the soundness of the New-York banks. Exclusive of the Marine, the aggregates of that date and of last Saturday compare thus: Difference. May 24 May 3. $813,178,000 $24,241,500 $337,419,500 Loans 31.386,300 296,575,300 327,961,600 Deposits 45,510,000 9,438,100 54,948.100 Specie, 22,026,700 5,835,100 27,861,800 Legal Tenders $67,536,700 $16,273,200 $82,809,900 Reserve Considering how serious has been thedisturbance through which the banks have now passed, and how they are now united for mutual defence, it is doubtful whether it would not have been wiser to publish the usual detailed statement on Saturday. Withholding information might easily cause more apprehension than a full statement under such circumstances. It appears that, not including the loan certificates in any form, the relation of reserve to liabilities is quite as favorable as it was in March of last year, and that the reserve held is actually larger than at that time, or in April, 1880. Nor does it appear that the banks have caused trouble by undue contraction of loans. Assuming that about $8,000,000 of collaterals have been used for loan certificates, the contraction of loans does not appear to have been more than tive per cent in three weeksa rate which hardly justifies current reports that the banks have been forcing sales of collaterals in vast amount. It would be much more just criticism to say that the banks might have avoided a great part of the difficulty, had they refused last year or last winter to lend so largely as they did in support of speculative operations. The closing of the West Side Bank on Saturday does not appear to have had any other cause than the misconduct of the runaway official, and there is much reason to suppose that the associated banks were stronger at the close of the week than their averages indicated. It appears from Treasury statements that